Skip to main content
A useful engineering memory explains why a decision was made, the evidence behind it, and whether it still applies. Recorded discussions can recover rationale; the current repository and issue tracker establish what actually shipped.

Start here

Choose one feature or technical decision and a bounded period. Give the agent access to the relevant history plus the current issue or repository state. Identify a Markdown file where the reviewed log belongs.

Copy this prompt

Use this in Screenpipe chat or an assistant with the required connections. Replace the brackets with your details. If the assistant lacks access, provide a reviewed excerpt; a prompt alone does not connect it to your history.

Check the result

Have the owner check the rationale, then open the linked implementation. If the recording and current code disagree, retain both with their dates rather than silently rewriting history.
Keep the durable file concise: one decision, stable identifier, status, and source links. Put long transcripts in an evidence appendix. When a later decision replaces it, add a superseded-by reference so an agent does not revive an abandoned plan.A coding assistant can read the reviewed log at the start of future work. It still needs current repository instructions and live code. Historical intent is context, not authority to ignore a newer requirement.

Continue

Agent memory workflow · for developers · meeting to engineering tickets