> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.screenpipe.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Compare your weekly plans with recorded work

> Use a weekly review to compare your intended outcomes with observable work and decide what to change.

Use a weekly review to compare your intended outcomes with observable work and decide what to change. Screen activity is partial evidence, not a complete measure of effort or productivity.

## Start here

Provide your three planned outcomes, the workweek dates and timezone, and known offline work. Use activity summaries for available active-time totals and source records for context.

## Copy this prompt

Use this in Screenpipe chat or an assistant with the required connections. Replace the brackets with your details. If the assistant lacks access, provide a reviewed excerpt; a prompt alone does not connect it to your history.

```text theme={null}
Review [week, timezone] against these planned outcomes: [list].
For each, report observed progress, evidence, blockers, and the next action.
Use activity-summary data for available active-time totals; never count
frames or search results as hours. Separate active time from elapsed spans.
Include offline work I supply and explicitly state coverage gaps.
Suggest one change to next week. Do not score my productivity.
```

## Check the result

Compare the draft with your calendar and completed artifacts. Correct project labels and add work the computer could not see. Keep one actionable change rather than a long list of judgments.

<AccordionGroup>
  <Accordion title="See a worked example" id="worked-example">
    | Planned outcome                 | Observed result                      | Next decision        |
    | ------------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | -------------------- |
    | Finish demo report              | Draft exists; review still open.     | Book a review block. |
    | Resolve recurring support issue | Two investigations, no verified fix. | Narrow reproduction. |
    | Prepare customer meeting        | Brief and source links checked.      | Keep this workflow.  |
  </Accordion>

  <Accordion title="Go deeper: setup choices and edge cases" id="details">
    A long open window can include idle time, interruptions, or unrelated work. Short activity can still produce an important decision. Treat time estimates as descriptive and reviewable.

    If the report helps for two weeks, consider scheduling a draft with a bounded date range and stable output location. Include a no-data outcome so an unavailable device does not produce a fictional weekly narrative.
  </Accordion>
</AccordionGroup>

## Continue

[Daily work review](/daily-work-review) · [reliable reports](/reliable-reports) · [consultant time tracking](/consultant-time-tracking)